Book Review: The Book of the Law by Aleister Crowley
In April 1904, a man on his honeymoon in Cairo sat down with a pen and some hotel stationery and, over the course of three successive noontime hours, wrote the founding scripture of a new religion. The man was Aleister Crowley. The religion was Thelema. The text was 220 verses long. It took three hours total to produce. That's about 73 verses per session, or slightly faster than you can order room service at a Cairo hotel, then or now.
Let me explain why this is more complicated than it sounds.
What the book actually says
The Book of the Law—formally Liber AL vel Legis, because no occult text is complete without a Latin title that functions as a credentialing mechanism—consists of three chapters, each attributed to a different Egyptian deity.1 Chapter one is spoken by Nuit, goddess of the night sky, who represents infinite space and possibility. Chapter two belongs to Hadit, the divine masculine principle, the point of consciousness at the center of everything. Chapter three is Ra-Hoor-Khuit, a god of war and vengeance, the Crowned and Conquering Child.2
The tonal shift across these three chapters is remarkable. It is as if someone wrote a Hallmark card, then a Nietzsche aphorism, then a military junta's inaugural address, and bound them together.
Chapter one is expansive and cosmic. Every man and every woman is a star. Love is the law, love under will. Come forth under the stars and take your fill of love. This is the part people quote at dinner parties.
Chapter two gets stranger. Hadit declares himself the flame that burns in every heart. Reason is dismissed as a lie. Joy is commanded. The passages are dense, knotted, occasionally beautiful in the way that fever dreams are beautiful.
Chapter three is where things go sideways.
Ra-Hoor-Khuit announces himself as a god of war and vengeance, demands worship through fire and blood, and delivers the line that has caused more interpretive heartburn than perhaps any sentence in occult literature: "Compassion is the vice of kings: stamp down the wretched & the weak: this is the law of the strong: this is our law and the joy of the world."3
Whether these passages are metaphorical descriptions of internal spiritual warfare or actual exhortations to conquer on the plane of temporal power remains, as scholars say, "a controversial issue."4 Many Thelemites find any literal reading repugnant. Others embrace it. The text itself offers no clarification, which is either profound or convenient depending on your disposition.
The central commandment
The book's most famous line is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."5
This sounds like a license for hedonism. It is not. Or rather, it is not supposed to be. Crowley distinguished sharply between the ego's everyday desires—what you want for lunch, whom you want to sleep with, whether you want to skip your dentist appointment—and what he called "True Will," a cosmic purpose unique to each individual, like an orbit through the universe that only they can occupy.6 As Lon Milo DuQuette, a prominent Thelemite, put it: if you follow your True Will, the universe assists you, like a celestial ball bearing rolling along a track cut specifically for it.7
The phrase itself was not new. François Rabelais, a sixteenth-century French monk, built an imaginary "Abbey of Thélème" in his satirical novel Gargantua and Pantagruel, whose only rule was "Fais ce que vouldras"—"Do what thou wilt."8 Rabelais believed that people who are free, well-born, and well-educated will naturally do virtuous things. The system works perfectly as long as you restrict membership to the virtuous.
Two centuries later, Sir Francis Dashwood inscribed the same motto over the door of his estate at Medmenham, where it served as the operating principle of the Hellfire Club.9 Which somewhat complicated Rabelais's thesis about innate virtue.
Crowley was familiar with both lineages. He claimed Rabelais had dimly foreseen the coming of the Thelemic age and even predicted Crowley's own arrival as its prophet.10 Modesty was not among his virtues. But the genealogy matters, because it reveals something structural: the same five-word sentence has been used to justify a utopian monastery, an aristocratic sex club, and a new global religion. The words do not change. The incentive structures around them do. The outputs diverge accordingly.
The man
Edward Alexander Crowley was born in 1875 in Leamington Spa, England, to a wealthy family of Plymouth Brethren—a rigid evangelical Christian sect whose members spent their time reading the Bible, preaching the imminent apocalypse, and prohibiting essentially everything that might make the wait bearable.11 His father was a travelling preacher. His mother, with whom he had a strained relationship, called him "the Beast," a reference to the Book of Revelation that the young Edward decided to take as a compliment rather than an insult.12
He attended Trinity College, Cambridge, left without a degree, and joined the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn in 1898.13 He climbed mountains. He wrote poetry. He contracted gonorrhea from prostitutes. He quarreled with W.B. Yeats, who was also in the Golden Dawn, because apparently the early twentieth-century British occult scene was small enough for that kind of collision.14
Then he went to Egypt.
In 1903 he married Rose Kelly. In 1904 they went to Cairo on their honeymoon. Rose began entering trance states. She told Crowley that the Egyptian god Horus was waiting for him. Crowley, skeptical, quizzed her on Horus to see if she was making it up. She answered correctly despite having no background in the subject. Then she took him to the Boulaq Museum and identified a specific artifact—the Stele of Ankh-ef-en-Khonsu, exhibit number 666.15
That is a detail that either confirms divine intervention or confirms that coincidence is weirder than people think. Take your pick.
Over the next three days, Crowley said he heard a voice—later identified as "Aiwass," an entity he described as tall, dark, and regal, like an Assyrian king—dictating the book to him from behind his left shoulder.16 He transcribed it on hotel stationery. The manuscript still exists.
There is a scholarly dispute about the paper. Its watermark may indicate a brand not commercially available until late 1905, which would be awkward for a text supposedly received in April 1904.17
Crowley himself initially described the text as "an excellent example of genuine automatic writing" before later insisting it was something more—not automatic writing but actual dictation from a real entity.18 The distinction mattered to him. It does not resolve anything for anyone else.
The incentive structure of prophecy
Here is where the structural observation lives.
Crowley claimed the text announced a new spiritual epoch—the Aeon of Horus, succeeding the Aeon of Osiris (patriarchal religion, the dying-and-resurrecting god) and the Aeon of Isis (matriarchal, nature-centered).19 And it appointed Crowley himself as the prophet of this new age. The Beast 666, chosen scribe, prince-priest.
This is a common structural feature of revealed religions. The text reveals, among other cosmic truths, that the person holding the pen is extremely important. Joseph Smith found golden plates that told him he was a prophet. Muhammad received the Quran from the angel Jibril, which designated him as the Seal of the Prophets. L. Ron Hubbard wrote Dianetics and then decided it was actually a religion, with himself at the top. The revelation always seems to land, with remarkable consistency, on the person best positioned to benefit from it.
I am not saying this proves fraud. I am saying the incentive structure is worth noticing.
Crowley's own behavior after receiving the text is interesting. He claimed to have resented it for years. He said he put the manuscript in an envelope, forgot about it, and rediscovered it in 1909 in the attic of his Scottish manor house while looking for his skis.20 He did not publish it until five years after he wrote it. This is either evidence that the text genuinely unsettled its recipient, or it is a brilliant piece of myth-construction. Both are possible. Both are interesting.
The aftermath
The religion Crowley built around The Book of the Law never achieved mass adoption during his lifetime. He founded an Abbey of Thelema in Cefalù, Sicily, in 1920, named after Rabelais's fictional abbey.21 Wild dogs wandered through the building. Cocaine eroded his nasal cavity. A young follower named Raoul Loveday died there in 1923—probably from drinking contaminated water, though the tabloid press preferred the version involving cat blood and Satanic ritual.22 Mussolini's government expelled him from Italy. The British newspaper John Bull declared him "the wickedest man in the world."23
He spent his later years broke, addicted to heroin (originally prescribed for asthma), and living off small contributions from the California branch of his Ordo Templi Orientis, which was being run by a rocket scientist named Jack Parsons.24 He died on December 1, 1947, in a boarding house in Hastings, England. He was 72. His reported last words were either "I am perplexed" or "Sometimes I hate myself," depending on which witness you believe.25
At his cremation service in Brighton, mourners read his poem "Hymn to Pan." Local newspapers called it a black mass. The Brighton council resolved to ensure nothing like it ever happened again.26
The legacy problem
Here is the thing about The Book of the Law that nobody on either side of the argument wants to sit with: it worked. Not in the way Crowley intended—there was no global Thelemic revolution, no mass awakening, no Aeon of Horus sweeping aside the world's religions. But the downstream effects are enormous and strange.
Gerald Gardner, the founder of Wicca, met Crowley in the last months of Crowley's life and was initiated into the O.T.O. Gardner borrowed extensively from Crowley's published rituals when composing Wiccan liturgy—so extensively that his collaborator Doreen Valiente later rewrote much of the material to obscure its origins.27 The Wiccan Rede—"An it harm none, do what ye will"—is a direct descendant of Crowley's law, with a safety clause bolted on.28
Anton LaVey's Church of Satan drew heavily from Crowley's Ordo Templi Orientis in constructing its rituals and philosophy.29 Chaos Magick, the postmodern branch of occultism that treats belief systems as tools rather than truths, is unthinkable without Crowley's precedent.30
And then there is the space program. Jack Parsons, who ran Crowley's American lodge, co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and helped invent solid rocket fuel.31 There is a direct organizational line from The Book of the Law to the rockets.
Crowley's face is on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. His motto was inscribed in the vinyl of Led Zeppelin III. Jimmy Page bought his former house in Scotland.32 The Ordo Templi Orientis today has roughly four thousand members worldwide.33
So: a 220-verse text produced in three hours on hotel stationery, by a man who claimed he was taking dictation from an invisible Assyrian, became the foundational document of a religion that influenced Wicca, Satanism, Chaos Magick, and the space program, and whose author ended up on a Beatles album cover. None of this was designed. The text says nothing about rocket fuel or pop music. The system Crowley built was meant to produce global spiritual transformation. What it actually produced was a diffuse, hydra-headed influence on twentieth-century counterculture that its creator did not live to see and could not have predicted.
Design, meet experience.
The Parsons problem
The Jack Parsons thread deserves its own examination, because it contains the single most structurally absurd chain of causation in the entire Thelemic legacy.
Parsons was a self-taught chemist who co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and helped develop solid rocket fuel for the U.S. military. He was also the head of Crowley's Agape Lodge in Pasadena, California, running it out of a mansion on South Orange Grove Avenue—Pasadena's "Millionaires' Row"—where he placed a newspaper ad specifying that "only bohemians, artists, musicians, atheists, anarchists, or other exotic types need apply for rooms."39
In 1945, a science fiction writer named L. Ron Hubbard moved in.40
Parsons and Hubbard collaborated on what they called the "Babalon Working"—a series of sex magic rituals in the Mojave Desert intended to incarnate a Thelemic goddess in human form.41 Hubbard served as "scribe," reportedly channeling messages from the goddess in a voice described as "the flame of life, power of darkness." Crowley, hearing about this from England, was appalled. He wrote to a colleague that Parsons had been "led astray" and "robbed of his last penny by a confidence man named Hubbard."42
He was right about the money. Hubbard absconded with Parsons's savings and his girlfriend.43
Four years later, Hubbard published Dianetics. Three years after that, he founded the Church of Scientology. In a 1952 lecture, Hubbard described Crowley as "my very good friend" and recommended Crowley's The Master Therion as "the only modern work" relevant to the magical traditions he was discussing.44 Hubbard's eldest son later claimed his father first encountered magic at age sixteen by reading The Book of the Law.45 The Church of Scientology's official position is that Hubbard infiltrated Parsons's lodge on behalf of U.S. Naval Intelligence to break up a dangerous occult group.46
Parsons died in 1952, at age 37, in a home laboratory explosion whose cause has never been conclusively determined.47
So: a 220-verse text dictated by an invisible Assyrian in a Cairo hotel room produced a religion whose California chapter was run by a rocket scientist whose houseguest stole his money and his girlfriend and went on to found Scientology. Crowley, from his boarding house, diagnosed the situation correctly as a confidence trick. Nobody listened. The incentive structure of charismatic authority does not include an error-correction mechanism.
The text that edits itself
One of the strangest features of The Book of the Law is that it contains instructions about its own handling.
Chapter I, verse 36, commands: the scribe "shall not in one letter change this book; but lest there be folly, he shall comment thereupon."48 Chapter III, verse 47 declares that the book must always be published alongside the original handwritten manuscript, because "in the chance shape of the letters and their position to one another: in these are mysteries that no Beast shall divine."49
The text is telling you that its physical handwriting contains hidden codes. It is also telling you that the person who wrote it cannot decode them.
This created an entire cottage industry. The number 220—the total verse count—maps onto the Kabbalistic Tree of Life (ten spheres times twenty-two paths). The manuscript was later re-numbered as Liber XXXI (31), because the first chapter's verses were unnumbered in the original dictation. The title "AL" has a numerical value of 31 in Hebrew gematria. Charles Stansfeld Jones, whom Crowley considered his "magical son," later discovered that 31 unlocked additional Kabbalistic readings of the text, which Crowley interpreted as itself having been foretold in the book.50
Whether these numerical correspondences are evidence of superhuman design or evidence that you can find patterns in any sufficiently complex text if you look hard enough is, as they say, left as an exercise for the reader.
There is also the matter of Crowley's wife. Rose Kelly, who had no training in Egyptology and no interest in magic, was responsible for two corrections to the manuscript—filling in words that Crowley had failed to hear during the dictation, by invoking Aiwass herself while Crowley was absent from the room.51 How she did this, if indeed she did, is not explained in any account I have found.
The reading experience
What is it actually like to read The Book of the Law?
Short. You can finish it in twenty minutes. It is 220 verses, which is roughly the length of a long blog post. Given the infrastructural weight it has been asked to carry—founding text of a world religion, cosmological manifesto, encoded cipher of divine prophecy—this is like discovering that the load-bearing wall of a cathedral is a single sheet of plywood.
The prose is strange. Not bad-strange. Strange-strange. It shifts between the oracular and the obscure, between passages of genuine lyric beauty and passages that read like someone losing a chess game against their own grammar. There are numerical puzzles embedded in the text that Crowley spent decades trying to solve. There are instructions to the scribe that refer to specific marks on the manuscript page. There is a section in the third chapter that Crowley himself admitted he could not interpret.34
The author himself found parts of it appalling.
Crowley's own commentary acknowledges the problem. He wrote that the third chapter "may be very repugnant to many people" and that its characteristics "superficially appear appalling."35 This is a religious founder admitting that his sacred text contains material he finds disturbing. That is either the most honest thing a prophet has ever said or further evidence of an internal contradiction the system cannot resolve.
The text's official commentary, written by Crowley in 1925, warns against discussing the book's contents and states that all questions of interpretation should be decided by appeal to Crowley's own writings.36 This is a common feature of revealed religions—the text says you are free, and the commentary says you are free to interpret it the way the prophet tells you. The incentive structure produces its own gravitational field.
A note on the gap
When Crowley received The Book of the Law in 1904, he was a practicing Buddhist. The text's rejection of compassion as a vice directly contradicted his own beliefs. He wrote later that the book "knocked my Buddhism completely on the head."37
This is worth pausing on. A man sits down and produces a text that contradicts his own convictions. He then spends the next four decades reorienting his entire life around it. Either the text arrived from somewhere outside his own mind—in which case we are in the territory of the genuinely supernatural—or his unconscious mind produced a document so powerful that his conscious mind surrendered to it.
Neither possibility is comfortable.
And Crowley knew it. He wrote that no forger could have prepared so complex a set of numerical and literal puzzles, that the proof of the text's superhuman origin existed in the manuscript itself, independent of any human witness.38 He may have been right. He may have been the most elaborate self-deceiver of the twentieth century. He may have been both simultaneously.
The system was designed to produce cosmic revelation. What it actually produced was a 72-year-old heroin addict in a Hastings boarding house, whose last words may have been "I am perplexed," and whose text went on to reshape the spiritual underground of the Western world without him.
He was not wrong about the perplexity.
1 The three chapters are attributed to the deities Nuit, Hadit, and Ra-Hoor-Khuit respectively. See Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
2 Crowley summarized the speakers: "We have Nuit, Space, Hadit, the point of view; these experience congress, and so produce Heru-Ra-Ha." Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
3 Liber AL vel Legis, Chapter II, verse 21. Full text available at O.T.O. U.S. Grand Lodge Library.
4 Tim Maroney, "The Book of the Law," Introduction to Crowley. tim.maroney.org.
5 Liber AL vel Legis, Chapter I, verse 40.
6 Crowley distinguished True Will from ordinary desire; see Wikipedia, "True Will".
7 Lon Milo DuQuette on True Will as an orbit. Wikipedia, "True Will".
8 François Rabelais, Gargantua and Pantagruel (1534), Chapters 52–57. See Wikipedia, "Thelema".
9 Sir Francis Dashwood inscribed the motto at his Medmenham estate, headquarters of the Hellfire Club. Wikipedia, "Thelema".
10 Crowley, The Antecedents of Thelema (1926). See Cannabis Culture, "Aleister Crowley, François Rabelais and the Herb of Thelema".
11 Crowley was born into a Plymouth Brethren family; his father was a travelling preacher. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
12 Crowley's mother Emily Bertha Bishop described him as "the Beast." Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
13 He joined the Golden Dawn in 1898, where he was trained by Mathers and Bennett. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
14 Yeats was Crowley's rival within the London Golden Dawn. Britannica, "Aleister Crowley".
15 Rose identified the Stele of Revealing, exhibit number 666, in the Boulaq Museum. Thelemapedia, "The Book of the Law".
16 Crowley described hearing a voice from Aiwass and later described the entity's appearance. Mysterium Academy.
17 Dispute over the manuscript paper's watermark and dating. The Old Craft, "Liber Al Vel Legis".
18 Crowley initially called it "genuine automatic writing" before insisting it was actual dictation. Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
19 The three Aeons: Isis, Osiris, and Horus. O.T.O. U.S. Grand Lodge Library.
20 Crowley rediscovered the manuscript in 1909 in his attic at Boleskine House while searching for his skis. The Old Craft.
21 The Abbey of Thelema in Cefalù, Sicily, founded 1920. Wikipedia, "Abbey of Thelema".
22 Raoul Loveday's death, most likely from contaminated water. Wikipedia, "Abbey of Thelema".
23 John Bull declared Crowley "the wickedest man in the world." Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
24 Crowley lived off contributions from the O.T.O.'s Agape Lodge, led by Jack Parsons. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
25 Crowley's last words variously reported as "I am perplexed" or "Sometimes I hate myself." Lawrence Sutin, Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley (St. Martin's Press, 2000), p. 417. See also Hastings Independent Press.
26 Brighton council resolved to prevent a similar service. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
27 Gardner borrowed extensively from Crowley's rituals; Valiente later rewrote the material. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley"; see also geraldgardner.com.
28 The Wiccan Rede as a descendant of Thelemic law. Tim Maroney, "Do What Thou Wilt".
29 Francis King described the Church of Satan's techniques as "somewhat vulgarized versions" of O.T.O. practices. See Allen H. Greenfield, "A True History of Witchcraft".
30 Crowley's influence on Wicca, Satanism, and Chaos Magick. Henrik Bogdan, "Rethinking Aleister Crowley and Thelema," Aries 21, no. 1 (2021).
31 Jack Parsons co-founded JPL and led Crowley's Agape Lodge. Bitter Winter, "Is Satanism Dangerous? 3. Early 20th Century Satanism".
32 Crowley's face on Sgt. Pepper's; "Do what thou wilt" inscribed on Led Zeppelin III. Wikipedia, "Aleister Crowley".
33 O.T.O. membership approximately 4,000 worldwide. Bogdan, Aries (2021).
34 Crowley admitted he could not fully interpret certain passages of Chapter III. Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
35 Crowley's own commentary on the third chapter's difficult nature. O.T.O. U.S. Grand Lodge Library.
36 "The Comment" (1925) warns against discussing the book's contents and directs interpretation to Crowley's own writings. Wikipedia, "Thelema".
37 Crowley: the book "knocked my Buddhism completely on the head." The Confessions of Aleister Crowley. See "The Vice of Kings: An Examination of Thelemic Compassion".
38 Crowley on the text's numerical puzzles as proof of superhuman origin. Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
39 Parsons's newspaper ad for bohemian tenants. Pasadena Now, "Exploring the Occult World of Jack Parsons".
40 Hubbard moved into Parsons's Pasadena mansion in August 1945. Wikipedia, "Scientology and the occult".
41 The Babalon Working, a series of sex magic rituals in the Mojave Desert. Occult Encyclopedia, "Babalon Working"; see also Henrik Bogdan, "The Babalon Working 1946," Numen 63, no. 1 (2016).
42 Crowley to Louis T. Culling, 28 October 1946: Parsons "was robbed of his last penny by a confidence man named Hubbard." See Bogdan, Numen (2016).
43 Hubbard absconded with Parsons's savings and partner Sara Northrup. Brandy Williams, "L. Ron Hubbard and the O.T.O.".
44 Hubbard's 1952 lecture describing Crowley as "my very good friend." Wikipedia, "Scientology and the occult".
45 Ronald DeWolf (Hubbard's eldest son) claimed his father discovered magic through The Book of the Law at age sixteen. Wikipedia, "Scientology and the occult".
46 The Church of Scientology's official position on Hubbard's OTO involvement. Wikipedia, "Scientology and the occult".
47 Jack Parsons died in 1952 in a home laboratory explosion. Bitter Winter, "Is Satanism Dangerous?".
48 Liber AL vel Legis, Chapter I, verse 36. Hermetic Library, "The Holy Books Preface".
49 Liber AL vel Legis, Chapter III, verse 47. Internet Sacred Text Archive.
50 The numerology of 220, 31, and Charles Stansfeld Jones's Kabbalistic key. Wikipedia, "The Book of the Law".
51 Rose Kelly's corrections to the manuscript while Crowley was absent. Hermetic Library, "The Holy Books Preface".
Comments
Post a Comment